Aluminium is crucial to vaccines – and safe. Why are US advisers debating it?

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03955-z

Comments

metalmanDec 4, 2025, 4:17 PM
aluminum is not safe, and it's inclusion as an "adjuvicant" is entirely, about money the only reason that aluminum "works" is that it triggers a massive immune response to it's sudden, and unwelcome presence in the human body, where, statisicaly, you will survive, but it is still very much a roll of the dice.
dc396Dec 4, 2025, 4:40 PM
> aluminum is not safe

[Citation needed]

As I understand it, aluminum salts have been used for decades globally, administered to over 1 billion people in vaccines with no statistically significant indication that it is unsafe. For example, in a study[1] in Denmark including more than 1 million children, there were no statistically significant increases in risk for any autoimmune and developmental outcomes they studied.

If you're going to assert a lack of safety in something that has been used so much for so long, it would be helpful to cite methodologically sound studies and non-anecdotal data to back up that assertion.

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40658954/

SetTheoristDec 4, 2025, 10:56 PM
I will definitely trust a random, prima facie absurd, claim from an anonymous someone on the internet (with bad grammar, misspellings, and lack of capitalization) over peer-reviewed scientific studies. Yep.
metalmanDec 5, 2025, 2:23 PM
vs, your "sneer review" that's the way , but the fact of aluminum's triggering an extream immune response, remains which of course you avoided