It seems like this starting to happen as soon as apps were installable on phones, even iPhones came (and still comes) with a ton of apps you cannot remove regardless of how little you use them. Android, because of the whole OEM story, of course is much worse, but I don't feel like any of what you share is new, been going on for decades at this point.
And if AT&T wasn't as desperate to gain market share, we could have had a different story. Both Verizon and Sprint refused the iPhone because they didn't want to give up control. The bloatware was an important piece, but Apple also mandated control over OTA updates which the carriers did not want to relinquish either. The carriers were also opposed to the phone being sold in Apple stores.
Part of why iPhone was such a breath of fresh air at the time it released. There was no carrier bloatware. Apple didn't allow it. Verizon turned down the iPhone because they would not agree to the no carrier branding and did not want to give Apple control over updates.
It's only gotten worse since then, but yeah its always been a thing.
At least with iPhone, there's still no carrier bloat, no facebook/meta, no linkedin, etc.
I'm not sure why Samsung continues to allow it either, they are also big enough to bully the carriers they could just as easily pull an Apple and kick all the spam off their phones, at least for the flagship models.
While a lot of the code that apps rely on is part of the OS frameworks, these days you can 'remove' most of the apps on an iPhone if you want.
That said, I would also argue that there's a difference between not being able to remove "Calendar" on iOS and not being able to remove "LinkedIn" on Android.
You see, the user you replied to spoke in the present tense, and is addressing the “(and still comes with)” portion of the original comment.
You couldn't even revoke permission to access the camera and Mic. It had permission to do literally anything, and you couldn't change it or remove it.
Which is stupid as I don't want my iPad to be getting every voice mail and imessage and so on that my phone does. They are different devices and serve different purposes. My iPad is totally a media consumption device and I have no interest in it being integrated into my phone's communication functions.
https://www.theregister.com/2015/08/12/lenovo_firmware_nasty...
The pixel 9a was on offer recently here in Spain for 319€ and that includes 21% tax. At major chain called media markt. That phone is one of the few supported by grapheneos.
Although this is not at your target price point. But /e/os can be used on hundreds of android phones (as opposed to GrapheneOS). So you can probably install it on your current phone
GrapheneOS team is helping Motorola build secure phones to spec. but Motorola won't have some special bloated flavor of GrapheneOS installed
Pinephone is being sold for 200 with included dock.
Just root your Android phone and put a custom ROM like LineageOS etc
If you want a stretch goal try and de-Google yourself, I have tried but failed twice now.
We only got in by installing the app on my Sony and him signing into his account. They charge a fee now to get paper tickets from the box office.
If, on the other hand, you care more about your hobby than these quirks annoy you, than by all means, go right ahead.
I could go to a baseball game last year and have been able to for decades. The march to enshittification isn't inevitable. Otherwise there will be no hobbies in the future, and I'll be hoarding my money to just sit in my house doing nothing.
How has that been working out for you? Apparently you have some avenue to apply pressure for that, other than the obvious one of not buying the tickets.
Why should anybody fire them, given that their actions have caused no actual harm to the bottom line? Obviously the ticket buyers don't care, so why should management or owners care?
> and elect politicians that will make policies like that illegal.
Sounds great. Who do I vote for?
You can have (or provide) a phone that's specifically for those use cases and you can turn it off for actual communication.
Lawsuit.
Organise.
Publicise.
Shame.
But it seems you LIKE being abused.
That's fine. They don't have to. Their solution can be calling their local representative and complaining that the stadium their city is paying for, is locking them out.
2) I did not analyze LineageOS yet and how it is different from stock Android, so I need to go through complete diff.
> If you want a stretch goal try and de-Google yourself
My goal is to have an open source system that is under my full control and doesn't play tricks on my by sending telemetry or collecting forensic databases. Because now I cannot even connect the phone to Internet and it is not as useful as it could be.
Give me a Linux phone with halfway decent modem drivers, or give me death.
My impression that you should treat your phone as something that can be hacked any moment and not store anything important there.
[1] https://www.sstic.org/media/SSTIC2024/SSTIC-actes/when_vendo...
Stop buying phones from Verizon?
[1]: https://keyboard.futo.org/
[2]: I never investigated this, so I always assumed that GBoard predicted what key I wanted to press when close to two letters. With FOSS keyboards, with a physically identical layout, I tended to make way more mistakes.
it's also not as good at "recovering" from typing too many letters (Gboard sometimes adequately completes with likely shorter words)
UnifiedPush, F-Droid, a GMaps webview (arguably cheating, but I'm not RMS), NewPipe or Invidious are all good-enough alternatives, but I remember struggling to find a keyboard that felt right when I was using a Pixel 2 for a fortnight.
I think I went with the oldest Fleksy or Minuum APK I could find (from a reputable source), as they were fine without GApps.
Though I'd also like to call out the fact that AOSP has talkback, the accessibility service built-in, but there's no AOSP TTS engine to use it with. This is especially noticable when trying to use any spoken directions in OSMAnd, as it requires a TTS engine to use that function.
The only reason it's not the dumbest thing about Google's stewardship of AOSP is that I'm not sight impaired - as it stands, the multi-trillion-dollar corporation ripping out the built-in SIP client in their phone OS takes that prize
Goldman Sachs paid $6 million to try to get its [soon-to-be] former chief counsel Kathryn Ruemmler's Google search results highlighting her close friendship and many-years-long association with Jeffrey Epstein off the first few pages of results.
Today, the first result on the first page of a Google search for her is the opening paragraph of her Wikipedia biography:
>Kathryn H. Ruemmler (born April 19, 1971) is an American attorney who was principal deputy White House counsel and then White House Counsel to President Barack Obama.[1] Previously a partner at Latham and Watkins co-chairing its white-collar defense group,[2] Ruemmler joined Goldman Sachs in 2020 and was Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel.[3] She announced her resignation from this position in February 2026, effective at the end of June, over her links to child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.[4][5][6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathryn_Ruemmler
>How a Secretive Firm Tried (and Failed) to Fix an Epstein Friend’s Tattered Image
>If you want a stretch goal try and de-Google yourself, I have tried but failed twice now.
My point is that even with unlimited resources it's impossible to de-Google yourself.
I was meaning more removing your reliance on Google in your life for search, photos, entertainment.
You can start small with Duckduckgo etc.
Xiaomi has been ironically the pioneer in this field, but their phones are inaccessible in the USA assuming you’re USA based. The mediatek chipset also is more fun for this over Qualcomm.
Besides suid binaries, the radio firmware and subsequent radios for WiFi and Bluetooth do give out a lot of information and are open to exploitation.
The most opaque and privileged attack surface is often the modem/baseband and vendor diagnostic stack and allow carriers to process local side AT commands.
Qualcomm is more documented, though there are fun discoveries on mediatek I’ve made just using binwalk.
Xiaomi has virtually stopped allowing users to unlock their bootloaders. They only allow 2000 device unlocks per day, which resets every day at 00:00 Beijing time. You can set an alarm and press the unlock button exactly at 00:00 Beijing time, only to get frozen out due to the thundering herd effect and fail to secure an unlock quota. Then, when you try again at 00:01, you just get the dreaded "quota limit reached, try again tomorrow" message.
Anecdotally, out of the ~50 or so I have installed right now on my laptop, which covers the basic calculator/calendar/contacts/etc., and also things like file compression, torrenting, a Mastodon client, RSS reader, and so on, all of them are ready to use on a phone.
Alas, if only there was a (reasonably priced + fully functional) phone that could use them.
How bad it's always been? Go find a Windows Recovery image for a Sony Vaio from the 2000s. Prepackaged shitware has always been a thing. I read this article and thought "wow someone finally matched an old Vaio."
That said, I want to hear a statement from Motorola on this. The GrapheneOS phones they announced a few months ago were going to be my "out" from this kind of nonsense. I want confirmation that I'll be able to trust them when it finally gets released.
Before we even had smartphones, your flip phone came with utterly indelible versions of Facebook and others.
And you'll be shocked to hear this I'm sure, but the very lowest level code that governs the radio in your phone is legally mandated to be managed by your service provider, and essentially always has been.
None of this is new. Not in the slightest. It's not even worse nowadays except that the apps themselves got more malicious. There aren't more baked in apps than before, and they aren't any more un-removable. The most important code on your device isn't yours, it never has been.
Something funny is up; this doesn't seem deliberate.
That employees cousin probably does social media for Abboud...
Humans reading code is so "legacy"...
You'd be surprised how many websites use Google Tag Manager to allow their marketing department to roll out trackers and other JS snippet directly into the site's root context.
GTM et al's sole reason of existence is to provide marketing people with a way to bypass corporate IT.
And I definitely would not rule out something like this being the cause in the end.
[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/motorola/comments/1s61usi/edge_60_p...
Between these companies pushing adware/spyware and Apple putting Apple Creator Studio ads in former iWork applications, ads for Apple Intelligence in the system settings, and pushing ads for their F1 movie in Apple Wallet, smartphones have reached the mass enshittification phase.
The only safe havens are Pixel with GrapheneOS and Fairphone with I don't know what exactly (Murena sorta has ads for their own stuff and has many other issues, I guess LineageOS then). Perhaps ironically, given the context, Motorola with GrapheneOS too :).
https://www.reddit.com/r/samsunggalaxy/comments/1t7vqr8/why_...
I am getting tired of all these nonsense.
At this point, Samsung may be shipping more malware than anyone else on phones
I haven't noticed any further links regarding this topic. Thus I have no idea if setting was fully implemented or abandoned but with this thread here you linked, but I'd rather guess they're full after user's data. And from what users wrote there, MS is not even doing this with some elaborated darkpatterns scenarios but just ordinary stealing these photos. This should be announced louder.
But as long as consumers continue buying, nothing will ever change.
After setting it up, I was surprised (but also not surprised) to see ads on the lock screen. The "feature" is called Glance and while it can be disabled in the settings it took me the help of a video tutorial to actually locate the setting.
Fuck Glance with all possible fuckery.
Also stopped it from updating automatically in the play store...
Still enough shenanigans to make me go to another brand with my next phone. I always liked Motorola phones for being fairly stock without a lot of bloat ware, but that time seems to be in the past.
See also: various firmware builds for Moto phones like https://dumps.tadiphone.dev/dumps/motorola/aito/-/tree/user-...
All the "best phones" for most of us are bloated tracking devices.
They were a great brand, cool phones, one of early Android players.
After being bought out by Google, Motorola had some of the best devices out there with stock android, especially in the budget segment (and loved among android devs).They had one of the best smartwatches in the game at the time - Moto 360 (2014!!).
Then, after dropping the Nexus 6, Google stripped the patents and sold them to Lenovo. For a while it was ok, even dropping the relatively innovative Moto Z which had all the cool "modular" addons, played with it for a bit and seemed cool.
And then, things seemed to start taking a turn for the worse as Lenovo kept enshitiffying it more and more, using the brand name as a wedge in the market in which they are basically forgotten. They have the Razr brand which is cool, but the segment that was their best (budget phones) is now ruined with adware so they can extract every bit of value from it.
Such a sad ending for a company that was so early in the space.
... I was so mad every time Motorola screwed the pooch in this era.
I was a first-gen Moto X user... on Verizon. I didn't get the Lolipop update forever and a day. I was a first-gen Moto Hint owner. We didn't get the wake word update, we got told to buy the Hint 2. And then finally, I was a first-gen Moto 360 owner. We didn't even get Wear OS updates at all. Not WearOS 2, not even WearOS 1.6. Every single first-gen product got immediately dropped for second-gen shit, and we got abandoned.
There are ways. All the apps that install this crap can be disabled through Android's app manager, no fancy method required. (Of course updates can bring them back... But "luckily" Motorola isn't too keen on providing those for their products).
Some examples of the apps to look for:
- App Box
- Games
- MotoApps
- Moto App Manager
- Live lock screen
The active adware apps depends on your region and career. In some region Motorola doesn't push adware at all.
Personally by just disabling those (and similar sounding crap) I've never had adware sneakily installed.
For Moto G or lower tiers Edge I can begrudgingly accept that it's part of the deal... But I would be livid if they did this to my $1500 phone, which is why I refuse to risk getting a razr. Whether you want to fight your phone maker and keep using their product is up to you.
Let's hope that the grapheneos partnership plays off in our favor next year!
Anything in the last few years has the moto app manager that force loads LinkedIn etc.
Due to cheap and cheerful with long lasting battery - I still buy Moto G - but setup offline and disable all these apps using https://github.com/Universal-Debloater-Alliance/universal-an...
For a particularly sensitive context I'd want to build the ROM myself on an appropriately secured machine running one of the major distros.
I just have no time and knowledge to build ROM myself. 100% open projects also suffer supply chain attacks.
I'd suggest not using apps that fail to respect your autonomy.
Seriously, get a Pixel and install GrapheneOS, or maybe a Fairphone with LineageOS.
Ah, the Google tax. They can turn the lock of that door (bootloader) when they choose to do so.
(Of course, there is more, like camera firmware, etc. but they are typically provided through the hardware providers.)
The question is really why are Motorola the only ones that have gone that extra mile so far and what does it say about the rest of the Android OEMs (including Fairphone, which unlike most is actually a younger project than GrapheneOS).
The main objective of the partnership is to do what you described in the former case, get Motorola up to a standard where GraphenOS could support the phone. They could not previously take a Motorola phone and build GrapheneOS for it because of numerous basic requirements they did not yet meet. I can guess that GrapheneOS only really condone the efforts Motorola will put in to meet their support requirements as a platform.
Motorola also gets to incorporate a subset of GrapheneOS's features and improvements as enterprise targeted Motorola features. GrapheneOS do not have any direct influence over the apps and policies for the stock GMS Android image Motorola ship with their phones. Motorola have no significant say in what GrapheneOS does with their OS. GrapheneOS can assist Motorola in hardening efforts at the OS and firmware layer etc.
The entire premise of GrapheneOS is total control of the device. There is no way they would release a Motorola phone with GrapheneOS installed, but with unremovable bloatware.
The degree to which I don't own my own device is insane.
This was the first and only Xiaomi device I ever bought, no matter how attractive they might seem.
Edit: the timer stays even after updates so the app is not enabled again
Of course the software side will be run by grapheneos but a company that has this guile I don't want to trust with even their hardware.
Nothing screams "secure" better than app hijacking and url injections.
What is next? Our banks selling our payment histories to the highest bidder?
They do it for your own good, so that you get "more opportunity for consumer experiences in stores and online."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Card_transaction_data
https://pirg.org/edfund/resources/how-mastercard-sells-data/
> Ben Schoon is a Senior Editor
Thank you so much for being not able to consume the screencast video in the article.
I am annoyed at the software degradation though. I don't appreciate the repeated unskippable prompts to set up Glance. I feel like when I bought the Ultimate Shanzhai Experience (a Umidigi F1 Play back in the Android 9 days), they didn't pull noxious bait-and-switch software tricks.
Gonna flash a rom on the Xiaomi anyway, but all oems are doing this type of stuff.
Which is a damn shame because not too many options exist with a headphone jack and a Snapdragon processor. I'm in an environment where Bluetooth is unreliable for a good chunk of my day.
The only other tablet that fits my needs is a gosh darn Surface which is like 1000$.
And then, once they become dominant enough starting to play it like the others but stuffing as many unremovable crap as possible.
Yeah, not now.
I understand not wanting to give Motorola any money because of this, though.
Initially the project won't change, but it likely will over time.
(I think the misunderstanding is that Motorola would make the GrapheneOS builds.)
You're probably just not willing to believe that a 'partnership' with a massive company will change things, like I do. I am disagreeing, not misunderstanding. There's a difference
Time will tell, but my bet is on the GrapheneOS team doing the right thing, they have always done so in the past.
I certainly have
> I have rarely seen any team more principled than them
Totally agree with you there.
I'll say no more because you pay a heavy penalty on HN for criticising the project.
I'll just say I hope the collaboration brings some needed maturity, level heads, and stewardship, and that the devs can continue just to focus on the tech.
Replacing the OS is one of the first things I do with every laptop, PC and mobile device to get rid of (most) crap that was installed without my consent.
Very little ability to do that with most devices these days, unfortunately.
I hope motorola collaborates with Pine and brings linux to phones. In the age of LLM apps are obviously not a problem. (Hopefully windows Phone 7, not 8 also comes back)
And there seems to be no way to buy a "free" smartphone without Google Services and telemetry below $250. Why 250? Because free OS have multiple bugs and issues and it is not rational to pay more than that.
I am considering two options, one, try to clean up and patch the firmware for a cheap smartphone (remove almost everything proprietary including Google Services, Unrusted Execution Environment, except for basic GUI and launcher), or two, port something like Lineage OS to my phone. Also I need to examine the network traffic and scan for potential weak points like SUID binaries. It is scary to think how much time I will have to waste for this.
Also, it is pretty stupid, in my opinion, to make an OS not based on Android, for example, use Qt for GUI, because there will be no apps for it.