Show HN: Posthorn, self-hosted mail without the mail server

https://github.com/craigmccaskill/posthorn
Introducing Posthorn, a self hosted email gateway. One docker container (or Go binary) between every self hosted app on your VPS and your transactional email provider. Set up Posthorn once, point your apps to it, done.

I was trying to deploy Ghost on a DigitalOcean droplet and found that DO and many different VPS services have started to block the default SMTP ports to try to combat the various types of abuse they get. To actually configure my app, I had to hack together a Postfix relay.

In another project, I had a static site which had a contact form, but my free Formspree account was occasionally hitting usage limits and I desperately wanted some of the anti-spam features they had gated behind their paid accounts so I put together a caddy module to catch HTTP POSTs and bounce them to my provider.

I kept bumping into these same email issues. Many of the services I wanted to host (Gitea, Mastodon, Umami, Comentario) ran into the same limitations. This felt like a really common issue that had no good solution.

Posthorn is what I built to solve this. It's a small Go binary (or 10 MB docker image) that sits between your self hosted apps and your transactional email provider of choice (shipping with support for Postmark, Resend, Mailgun, Amazon SES or an outbound SMTP relay). It also accepts POSTs from HTML forms to support static site needs while adding security layers such as honeypot fields, origin checks and IP rate limiting. There's also a JSON HTTP API that supports Bearer auth for backend scripts or cron jobs that just want a /send endpoint.

I now use this personally in multiple scenarios and I've spent a lot of time beating this up and testing against what I can validate. I'd love to hear how this might be useful for you, what breaks and any feedback you might have. It's open source under Apache 2.0 and I'd love contributions. I'm planning to support and grow this for the long haul.

Code: https://github.com/craigmccaskill/posthorn

Docs: https://posthorn.dev/

Longer write up: https://craigmccaskill.com/introducing-posthorn/

Previous HN discussion on the exact issue I'm trying to solve: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43620318

Comments

radiospielMay 27, 2026, 7:20 AM
An interesting combination of features.

Personally, I have used nullmailer in the past to provide a sendmail compatible local install that immediately forwards email to the SMTP server of my choice. Has worked flawlessly.

Obviously, that doesn't come with HTML form support, but then I am also not sure I would like the same binary to handle both a HTTP(S) endpoint and email submission :)

craigmccaskillMay 27, 2026, 7:33 AM
[flagged]
npodbielskiMay 27, 2026, 7:06 AM
> Nobody wants to self host email server.

I do. Though I am self hosting it to have my personal email, being well... personal. Not for my company so maybe I am not the target.

Interesting project though. I always felt missing API to just send emails from some script in my mail server.

craigmccaskillMay 27, 2026, 7:44 AM
Personal mail is the one case I think where hosting your own MTA still makes sense when you want to own the addresses and the data. You still have to solve for deliverability, which is something I hope to never have to do.

Posthorn is built for the opposite end of that, you've already decided you want to use a transactional provider for app mail and you just want to stop having to deal with wiring it into all of the things. Obviously for a big production app you build your own mail service, but for gluing together a bunch of different apps you're self hosting, I think this makes sense and addresses a real issue.

If you want an API piece to augment what you already have, Posthorn might still be useful regardless of how the rest of your mail is set up. A Posthorn JSON endpoint is just a POST with Bearer auth and an idempotency key. Example from my docs:

curl -X POST https://posthorn.yourdomain.com/api/transactional \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $WORKER_KEY_PRIMARY" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -H "Idempotency-Key: reset:user-123:$(date -u +%FT%H)" \ --data '{ "to_override": "bob@example.com", "subject_line": "Reset your password", "message": "Click here: https://app.example.com/reset/abc" }'

Could run alongside your existing mail server. It's a small enough overhead that the juice might be worth the squeeze.

throwaway81523May 27, 2026, 6:56 AM
Is Posthorn a reference to W.A.S.T.E.?
craigmccaskillMay 27, 2026, 7:48 AM
Not intentionally, but TIL that this turned into an apt reference. The pynchon connection is excellent.

My (intentional) reference was to the older mail courier horn.

47282847May 27, 2026, 7:15 AM
Not OP but I read it as reference to just https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_horn
ranger_dangerMay 27, 2026, 7:03 AM
Don't services like SES already operate over 443/TLS and aren't blocked?
craigmccaskillMay 27, 2026, 8:01 AM
Correct, but not all apps can talk directly to an HTTPS API. Ghost, Gitea, Mastodon, NextCloud, Authentik, Matrix to name a few all only have built in SMTP support. Posthorn listens for that connection from those apps locally and translates it into whatever your transactional mail provider needs.

If all the apps you're running can already integrate via HTTPS API, Posthorn doesn't solve anything for you in that case, unless the unified credential, single retry policy and logging meaningfully simplifies things for you.

And honestly, SES was the easiest integration for me to write (even if it ended up being the most LOC), their documentation, examples and error responses gave me a really easy time setting it up. Additionally, because it does need such a verbose implementation SES ends up being a great case study for Posthorn and not needing to maintain the same 200 line signing routine in multiple different places.