126 curated cases, each with reconstructed flight paths (with the basis for each track), the official or best-supported explanation shown first, and a 0–10 documentation score. The primary sources as map layers: ~10k Project Blue Book files (the Air Force's own photo files show inside the case, e.g. the Heflin Polaroids and the Minot B-52 radar scope), all 2,768 cases from France's GEIPAN with their A–D findings, and 22,000 OCR pages of the MUFON, APRO, NICAP and CUFOS journals, which are full-text searchable in the browser via a sharded word index. Checks: the sky at the moment (astronomy-engine), historical weather (ERA5 via Open-Meteo), FAA military airspace, rocket launches, and a "what did I see?" ranker. The globe renders on demand, so an idle page costs almost nothing. It's a UAP edition of Bilawal Sidhu's open-source God's Eye View. Corrections are welcome; every case has a "suggest a correction" link.
But, that could be other possibly freely available data sets you could add to your project, such as if there's known planets in high visibility, geothermal storms, SpaceX launches, satellite falls, maybe flight radar data if that freely exists, and so on.
Anyway very interesting! You might see what the ufo/uap community on reddit thinks about it.
Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS-I) may be associated with nuclear testing and reports of unidentified anomalous phenomena https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-21620-3
Can subgroups of the incidents, with images included, be fed into an AI for it to attempt to come up with a reasonable theory of their causation and spacetime placement? The individual theories can then be embattled and merged into a cohesive unified theory.