Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.
Moderators sometimes unflag stories, if they feel the discussion is genuine.
The people have voted.
...can't make this up. the irony is palpable
Top "israel" posts from the last year, many with over 1000 karma
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastYear&page=0&prefix=tru...
Who the heck are you exactly?
some people dislike this, others hold the opposite opinion
From the guidelines
> On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.
An interesting example is the results of the US presidential election often sitting at the #1 spot for a while
many submissions span both and the HN community is on average pretty good about filtering wheat from chaff
if you find content inappropriate for HN, flag it, hide it, and move on
I have yet to see any credible evidence or analysis for this in more than 15 years on HN, just anecdotes and occasional instances where moderation shows its a hard and imperfect job
You misread what I said.
"stringent moderation" has certain connotations often accompanying the moderation conspiracy theorists comments here
forgive me for interpreting this way based on the above and in the context of your broader comment history
Dang, or someone can explain why this is flagged?